Flow Builder stops where the real work starts: multi-system logic, judgment calls, the processes that live half in Salesforce and half everywhere else. Describe the workflow in plain English. Ballet builds it, runs it the same way every time, and nothing writes to your org until you approve.
Flow moves records inside Salesforce. The workflows that actually hurt reach outside it: contracts, call recordings, billing systems, spreadsheets, a partner's org. That's where Flow ends and tickets to the systems team begin. Ballet picks up exactly there.
 Ballet | Flow Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-system workflows (SF + everything else) | Runs them end to end | Stops at the org boundary |
| Judgment and reasoning steps | Handled by agents | Not possible |
| Time to live | Hours, in plain language | Weeks of admin build, or the backlog |
| Safety | Simulate, scope, roll back | Test in sandbox, hope in prod |
| Maintenance | Self-healing | Breaks quietly when fields change |
| Run visibility | Full audit trail, built in | Debug logs |
Flow can't reason and stalls on multi-system logic. Apex can do anything but costs you a developer and a backlog. Ballet handles the steps Flow can't, in hours, without an eng ticket
Yes. Simulation mode, scoped permissions, and snapshot/rollback mean nothing writes to Salesforce until you approve. Every run is logged
They move data between apps, cap out on complexity, and you maintain them forever. Ballet runs the judgment-heavy workflow end to end and keeps itself working
We'll build a sample of your workflow against your real systems and show you the output, often within days. No SOW, no long implementation
We'll build it in Ballet on your real systems and show you the output. See it run before you commit.
