# Automation you can trust in production | Ballet

> Canonical: https://ballet.dev/ballet-vs-power-automate

Outgrown Power Automate? Ballet runs production-grade workflows you can review, simulate, and roll back, so automation stops being a risk you carry.

Automation you can trust in production.

Power Automate is fine to start, until you need audit trails, version control, and rollback. Ballet runs production-grade workflows you can review, simulate, and undo.

## Side by side

| | Ballet | Power Automate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Approach | Deterministic workflows + agents, written as code | Visual flows and connectors |
| New integration | Generated on demand against any API | Connector library or custom connector |
| Complex multi-system work | Scales, written as code | Limited, lower deployment maturity |
| Output when it matters | Deterministic, agentic where it helps | Deterministic, weak governance |
| Breakage | Evals on every step, auto-patched with a diff | Breaks when a flow or system changes |
| Review & version control | Generated code, version-controlled | Weak auditing, no real version control |
| Time to first workflow | 30 minutes | Hours, limited production control |


## Ballet vs Power Automate, answered.

### Can Ballet do everything Power Automate does?

And the production-grade work it can’t, with audit, version control, and rollback built in.

### We already use Power Automate. Do we rip it out?

No. Keep it for the basics; bring Ballet in for workflows that need real governance and reliability.

###  Is it enterprise-ready?

Yes. Run history, approval gates, simulation, and rollback are built in, not bolted on.

### How is it more reviewable than a flow?

Generated, version-controlled code with evals on each step, instead of opaque flows.

## Next step

We’ll rebuild your most painful Power Automate flow in Ballet, live.

[Request early access](https://ballet.dev/signup)